Immortality?

I don't want to achieve immortality through my work… I want to achieve it through not dying.
~ Woody Allen
One of the advantages of living in a Christian community house is what I find stuck to the fridge. Not too long ago one of my housemates ripped and ad out of a Christian mag and posted it. It is an ad for a Christian school of leadership development and it features a picture of a young woman with her hands folded in prayer looking pensively(?) at the camera. The background is dark but a charcoal coloured cross is clearly visible in the centre. In large letters at the top the ad asks, What are you willing to die for? Then, in a smaller font at the side (beside the young woman) it says this, “My life matters and it won't be wasted. I will leave my mark on this world even if I have to die in the process.”
So, we all had a good laugh (the program is also explicitly for single men and women) but the ad got me thinking. You see, when it comes down to it, I think this ad has a lot more to do with paganism than it has to do with Christianity. The emphasis of the ad is on doing something that leaves a mark on the world. Doing something so lasting that it's worth dying for. Yet this essentially buys into a pagan understanding of immortality. We gain immortality through what we do, we do something that means we are never forgotten, we live forever through the impact of what we've done and in the memories of others. But Christianity asserts that we approach things from a fundamentally different perspective. As Christians our primary focus is not on making a difference in the world. Our primary focus is on being faithful to Jesus (of course if we are faithful we will make a difference but this is secondary and may not even by recognisable to us). That's why I began with the Woody Allen quote. Christians also should have little interest in gaining immortality through our work. Yet, unlike Woody, we are not afraid of dying but are granted the promise of new life rooted in Jesus' resurrection. Because of this assurance we are not afraid to live faithfully no matter how worthless, wrong-headed, and inconsequential such a lifestyle may appear to be.

Personalising Creation: Marduk and Citigroup

Within Old Testament Ethics for the People of God, Christopher Wright argues that ancient Israel's approach to creation was fundamentally different than the nations that existed around Israel. The Canaanite fertility cults were rejected because Israel had been taught that the LORD was the source of nature's abundance; and the astral deities of Babylon were rejected because the astral bodies were revealed to be objects created by the LORD's power.
What is especially interesting in Wright's discussion around this topic is the distinction he makes between personalising and personifying nature. Within the Old Testament nature is regularly personified — i.e. nature is spoken about “as if it were a person.” Yet this is a rhetorical device that does not ascribe personhood or personal capacity to nature or natural forces in themselves. In fact, Wright argues, to personalise nature (“to attribute ontological personal status to nature itself”), results in both depersonalising God and demoralising the relationship between humanity and God. Wright argues that this is so because to give creation a status due only to God and (derivatively) to humans who bear God's image is actually a form of idolatry.
I find Wright's comments to be especially intriguing in light of fairly recent developments within American law (cf. “The Ultimate Weapon” in Profit Over People: neoliberalism and the global order by Noam Chomsky). Gradually corporations and businesses have been granted human rights (speech, freedom from search and seizure, the right to buy elections, etc.). To use Christopher Wright's language, corporations have been legally personalised. Consequently, these corporate entities have attained the rights of immortal persons — the rights they have now go far beyond what real persons are granted. This is not only because corporations have become so powerful but also because (post-NAFTA) corporations have been able to do such things as sue governments and have thereby been granted the rights of nation-states. Once creation is personalised it does not take long for that personalised creation to become a god in possession of a kingdom. Although we may not have been aware of the implications American law has given birth to idolatry. The corporate divinities are the gods of the Western nation-states. The Canaanites had Baal. We have General Electric and Talisman Energy. The Babylonians had Marduk. We have Citigroup and the Royal Bank of Canada.
One of the great tragedies in all of this is the fact that Western Christians are oblivious to the fact that they have been worshiping idols. But, as Christopher Wright argues in his section on the land, “the economic sphere is like a thermometer that reveals both the temperature of the theological relationship between God and Israel… and also the extent to which Israel was conforming to the social shape required of them in consistency with their status as God's redeemed people.” The LORD is not content to merely be a God of history and festivals. The LORD is God of the land and everything that goes with it. And when the people of God succumb to the same economic evils as the people around them, they have ceased to function as a “light to the nations” — no matter how faithfully the can expound upon the four spiritual laws (of course, the fact that these “laws” are the ones labeled “spiritual” reveals how oblivious we are of our own idolatry).

Gratitude and Joy: The Playful Ethics of a Delight-Full People

It is possible that in playing we can anticipate our liberation and with laughing rid ourselves of the bonds which alienate us from real life.
~ Jurgen Moltmann
I have recently been revisiting many of my thoughts about suffering, lamenting, and journeying with those in exile. Having been put off by the dominant self-indulgent and trite approaches that Christians (and the rest of society) tend to take toward suffering I fear that I have been missing a crucial part of journeying with the godforsaken. I have focused on genuinely empathising with such people, sharing in their cry, their pain, and their abandonment. And I still continue to do that… but that's only one part of the picture. The other bit, the bit that I've been missing, is how we go about doing this. If we are the Shekinah that goes forth to be with exiled people then we really do transform tears into laughter, isolation into solidarity, and death into new life.
This means — and this is the key of what I'm getting at — that even as we journey with those in exile, we will be known as delight-full people. This is so for two reasons. The first is because we remember. We remember the goodness of what God has done for us, especially in Christ. Therefore, the corollary of remembrance is gratitude. And this is what I've been missing. I had realised that God's goodness towards me required that I exhibit this goodness towards “the needy” but I was missing the fact that this action is performed fundamentally as an expression of gratitude. It was Christopher Wright's comments in Old Testament Ethics for the People of God that blew this door open in my mind. In my focus on lament I had focused on reminding God of the plight of the abandoned — lest he forget his covenant (yes, there is prophetic precedence for this). But what I was missing was the fact that my lack of gratitude revealed that it was I who had forgotten what God had already done. And, as C. Wright goes on to argue, without gratitude we lose the ethical implications of our own history and end up undergoing a moral decline that leads to outright disobedience.
The second reason why we are a delight-full people is because of our expectation. Not only do we remember what God has done, but we remember God's promises, and what God will do. Therefore (especially since we have already received the first-fruits of this in the coming of the Holy Spirit), we live as a people filled with joy. It is my recent research on the Lord's Supper that really has me thinking about this. Because we are assured that God is making all things new we can operate joyfully even in the midst of brokenness. The anticipatory and eucharistic aspects of the Lord's Supper make joy an unavoidable part of Christian living. This is not because we are cold-hearted or refuse to enter in the pain of others. We will still mourn with those who mourn for as long as they mourn, but sorrow will not have the last word. It is the root of joy that we have in the assurance of our hope that enables us to stay in those broken places. And it is the joy that we exhibit even in mourning that makes our mourning transformative.
Therefore, this allows us to operate with a much more playful ethic. Here Moltmann's comments in The Church in the Power of the Spirit become significant — especially in light of my own personal biases. Moltmann argues that a Western focus upon Jesus' Lordship has caused our ethic to be one that follows the structure of command and obedience. However, when one comes to appreciate the aesthetic side of Jesus' reign (that is to say, Jesus is the Lord of the cosmos but also the Lord of glory) our response can be much more festive. Having encountered the Father who runs out on the road to meet his prodigal children how can we not overflow with joy? As Moltmann also says in Theology and Joy, “Only the innocent, namely children, or those liberated from guilt, namely the beloved, are able to play.” It's as though we move into the margins and join the songs of lament only to discover that somehow along the way those songs have gained new strains and turned into songs of wonder and of praise. It's as though we join those dancing because their hearts are broken and somehow the dance transitions into a dance performed by overflowing hearts. And soon everybody is dancing, and laughing, and we realise that right here, right now, we are participating in the wedding banquet of the Lamb.

Isaiah 40.1-2

For you, there'll be no more crying,
For you, the sun will be shining,
And I feel that when I'm with you,
It's alright, I know it's right.

~Fleetwood Mac
This is the sort of people that we should be if we genuinely do believe that there will come a day when Christ will return and make all things new. For we are those who do affirm that one day there will be no more crying, one day all wounds will be healed, one day the sun of righteousness will rise with healing in its wings. If we believe this then this should be clear in our interactions. We should journey with those who are crying and those who are in darkness so that they too may glimpse this assurance. So that when we are with them they will know all will be right.
And the songbirds keep singing,
Like they know the score,
And I love you, I love you, I love you,
Like never before.

~ Fleetwood Mac

Remembrance and Expectation

Over against the contemporary emphasis upon “being in the moment” and living within the “Eternal Now,” Christians are to be a people marked by remembrance and expectation.
The most definitive stages of history are the past and the future. The past is definitive because of the death and resurrection of Jesus and the out-pouring of the eschatological Spirit; and the future is (even more) definitive because it is in the future that all of history will be consummated and all creation will be made new.
This is not to say that Christian avoid the present through cheap sentimentality or utopian dreams. What is does mean is that Christians live within the present very much shaped by the past and the future — we do what we do now because we remember and we expect.
People with no memory or hope are trapped within the “Eternal Now” where they are unsure about what to do, or why they do what they do.
Slowly I am learning how to live with memory and hope. I firmly believe that understanding ourselves historically is essential to living transformatively.

Jesus and Caesar

But we should also note that [current] attitudes [held by the frustrated general public] fall far short of the ideas that animated the democratic revolutions. Working people of nineteenth century North America did not plead with their rulers to be more benevolent. Rather, they denied their right to rule.
~ Noam Chomsky
And, once again, this is where those who belong to much of the “Christ transforming Culture” approach (especially as it is presented by H.R. Niebuhr) essentially miss the point. They choose to operate from within the structures of power pleading for a little more morality, a little more social consciousness, a little more benevolence. If we fawn at the feet of the king perhaps he will throw us a bone.
Yet when Christians recognise that Jesus, and only Jesus, is our king and ruler we do not bow and scrape before corrupt powers that try to claim the authority of Christ. Instead we deny their right to rule over us and live within a Church that exists as its own polis. Of course, when we deny the lordship of these “satanic” powers (for these powers also try to claim the throne of heaven as their own) we can be assured that we are on the right track to genuinely transforming culture.

RIP: Ross

Two months ago Ross, a friend of mine, was killed by a drunk driver. Ross had a habit of walking out in the street without looking around, and late one night an eighteen year old kid who had had a few too many beers ran him over.
Ross was a homeless man who was always lingering around my school. I got to know him over the last year and saw him often on a street near my house. (I was his “buddy” — regularly buying him cigarettes and bus tickets probably helped our relationship a lot.) Ross was something of a gentle giant. He always looked sort of sketchy, he had long dirty hair, big features, a grizzled beard, and torn clothing. Yet he said he was the least violent person you would ever meet, and that was true. He would always stop students and remind them to call their mothers. “Call your mom, call her tonight and remind her that you love her. It will make her day.” It makes me wonder what happened between Ross and his mom, and what sort of sorrows he carried.
Ross loved going to my school, a school of Christian theology. He would ask for money, or coffee, or whatever, and he knew how to push Christians’ buttons.
“Hey, are you a Christian?”
“Yeah man!”
“Great, can I have some change then?”
Or:
“Hey, do you think God rules over everything?”
“Sure.”
“So do you believe that what you have belongs to God?”
“Sure.”
“Well can I have some change since it isn’t really yours?”
Ross was a mischievous fellow with a great sense of humour. He once approached a group of Frosh from the University who were sitting at a bus stop holding a cake.
“Hey, can I have a piece of cake?”
“Um, no, sorry.” The students looked sort of nervous so Ross got very close to them and said,
“Well… can I at least lick some icing off the top?”
There is always a sense of sorrow, loss and tragedy involved with death — especially with an unexpected death. Yet, when I think of Ross I don’t find myself mourning for him. Ross was a beautiful man, sure of the fact that he was loved by God, and I think he has now entered into rest. Ross has finally been welcomed home.
Yet I mourn for the boy that hit him who will now face charges of manslaughter and have to live with the knowledge that he killed a man. And I also grieve for my school. There is much talk about radical love and God’s concern for the poor at my school but such things seem so often to be present in words and not deeds. Ross confronted my school and revealed the hypocrisy that was present. Ross forced us to live with integrity in all areas of our lives. Instead of allowing us to simply go and feel good about ourselves by volunteering a few hours out of our weeks, Ross confronted us on our time, in our space. Ross was a blessing and essential element of our community. In him, Christ came and visited my school. So I worry now. There are no Rosses coming to my school. We are now lacking a necessary part of our community and it now becomes easy to be distantly removed academics — comfortable once again in our wealth and privilege. I pray that God will send another one like him to us.

Remembrance

Gordon T. Smith, author of A Holy Meal: The Lord's Supper in the Life of the Church, suggests that there are seven motifs that give definition to the Lord's Supper — Remembrance, Communion, Forgiveness, Covenant, Nourishment, Anticipation, and Thanksgiving.
In speaking of remembrance Smith argues that celebrating the Lord's Supper as a memorial causes us to anchor our minds and hearts in a past event. Over against cultural voices that urge an ahistorical lifestyle, Smith argues that we must be able to remember otherwise our love becomes untruthful and our lives become meaningless. Therefore, it is the memory of Jesus' death and resurrection that takes priority over all the other memories that swirl around us.
However, remembrance is not merely an intellectual activity. This is especially evident in the Old Testament. The primary power of remembrance is that it causes the past to be made present. Remembrance is not nostalgic or cheaply sentimental, it is not an escape from the present into the past, but it is living within a past-shaped present. Not only is the past made present but the one we remember also becomes present — not that Christ is made present but we are awakened to the fact that Christ is already present in our midst.
Yet there is another side to remembrance in the Old Testament that Smith does not pick-up on. Not only is remembrance something that the people of God must focus upon but there are also times when the people of God must cause God to remember. This is particularly the case for those who are experience exile — for Christ is not always present in our midst. Exile, after all, is the experience of godforsakenness. Thus Exodus 2, the lament psalms, and several passages within the prophetic books, all speak of those who have been abandoned now crying out for God to remember the covenant he made with his people. As Exodus 2 says, “And the sons of Israel sighed because of the bondage and they cried out; and their cry for help because of their bondage rose up to God. So God remembered his covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. God saw the sons of Israel and God knew them.”
Now, I am quite convinced that much of the Church in North American is experiencing something akin to exile (I don't think this is the case because the Church has lost socio-political power; rather, I think that the fragmentation, disunity, and spiritual emptiness of many churches points to exile). In such a situation the Lord's Supper as a memorial can serve a dual purpose. It will cause the people of God to remember their true identity, and — when celebrated as a cry to heaven — it can also cause God to remember the new covenant that was inaugurated by Christ. In the Eucharist we remember who we are and remind God of who he is. Thus, there can be times, especially in exile, that celebrating the Lord's Supper does make Christ present once again.

Funniest Thing I've Ever Been Told

I was talking with one of the kids at my work and this is probably the funniest things anybody has ever said to me at work (note: he was very drunk when he said this).
So you know I’m a straight man, Dan. But there’s this guy who has a crush on me. Whatever, I’m a straight man. But I love people a lot, right? I just have so much love for everybody and maybe, if it came down to it, if this let this guy know that he was loved, then maybe I would fuck him. Maybe I would fuck him, and Mike and Darren… But don’t worry, Dan, I’m not going to fuck you.
Wow. I’ve never had a youth reassure me that he wouldn’t fuck me! I was trying hard to keep a straight face but it was pretty impossible. Thankfully he was too drunk to remember any of this conversation in the morning.
That’s all.

September Books (and brief update)

Well, not a lot of book reading this month. Since I’m back to school I’ve been reading a lot of articles and selected chapters but not much cover-to-cover. I’m continuing to work full-time and I’ve also started creating a new non-profit that helps sexually exploited people exit the sex trade — so I’ve been busy. Anyway…
1. Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making Volume 1 by James D. G. Dunn. Jimmy Dunn operates from a more traditional source and form critical methodology (think Wellhausen and Bultmann) than the likes of Tom Wright but this book reflects how long he has spent studying the New Testament. It also reveals an author who seems to have a great amount of affection for the person at the core of this study. Dunn blends passion with serious critical scholarship and, although this book is a bit of a monster (it’s 1000+ pages!) it’s worth picking up even as reference material.
2. A Holy Meal: The Lord’s Supper and the Life of the Church by Gordon T. Smith. I’m studying with Gordon this term (a spiritual theology course on the meaning of the sacraments) so I figured it would be good to start the term by reading one of his books. I love the way that Gordon develops the significance of symbol — it fits well with what others like Ricoeur, Lindbeck, and Brueggemann have said — and then looks at the various motifs around the Lord’s Supper (remembrance, communion, forgiveness, covenant, nourishment, anticipation, and eucharist). Gordon is very ecumenical and treats all Christian traditions with a great amount of respect, emphasising the the Lord’s Supper should unite, not divide, the Church.